Skip to content
Knowledge Base/ Sequencing Methods/ Metatranscriptomics for studying microbiome activity

Metatranscriptomics for studying microbiome activity

Explore the key differences between metagenomics and metatranscriptomics, their applications and analytical capabilities to choose the sequencing method best suited to your study objective.

CATEGORY
NGS services
PROJECT STAGE
01 · Sequencing methods
READING TIME
2 min
LAST UPDATED
2 November 2026
PREPARED BY
weSEQ.IT Technical Team
Get a quote

Metatranscriptomics analyses RNA from microbial communities and allows you to determine which genes are expressed under the conditions studied. Choose it when you want to assess the microbiome's response to environmental change, diet or an experimental treatment. If you are primarily interested in microbiome composition and the presence of genes with specific functions, the more suitable choice is shotgun metagenomics.

Metatranscriptomics versus shotgun metagenomics

METATRANSCRIPTOMICS VERSUS SHOTGUN METAGENOMICS4 items
FeatureMetatranscriptomicsShotgun metagenomics
MaterialRNA reverse-transcribed into cDNADNA
Main questionWhich genes are expressed?Which microorganisms and genes are present?
Functional informationGene expression and assignment of genes to functions and pathwaysFunctional potential encoded in genes
LimitationRNA abundance is not a direct measure of enzyme activityThe presence of a gene does not confirm its expression

Which should you choose?

Choose metatranscriptomics, when you plan to compare gene expression in the microbiome between groups, conditions or time points. The analysis may include transcript assembly, taxonomic assignment, functional annotation and between-group differential analysis, using resources such as GO, KEGG, eggNOG, CAZy or CARD.

Choose shotgun metagenomics, when you want to determine community composition and detect genes associated with, for example, metabolism or antibiotic resistance.

Both methods can be used together on the same samples. DNA data help you assess whether a change in the RNA signal is associated with a change in gene expression or a change in the relative abundance of a particular microorganism in the community.

Sample requirements

The starting material is total RNA. Library preparation includes rRNA depletion and the construction of stranded libraries. Indicative requirements for extracted RNA are shown below.

SAMPLE REQUIREMENTS6 entries
ParameterRequirement
Total amount≥1 µg
Concentration≥50 ng/µl
Volume≥20 µl
IntegrityRIN ≥6.5
Purity (A260/A280)1,8-2,0
Purity (A260/A230)1,0-2,5

We determine the quantity of biological material required for extraction based on the sample type. It is worth agreeing on collection, preservation and transport procedures before starting the experiment. Stabilise the material promptly to prevent RNA degradation, using the same procedure across all groups.

Approximate data output

The recommended amount of sequencing data is 12 Gb of data per sample using Illumina PE150, i.e. 2 × 150 nucleotides. This corresponds to approximately 40 million read pairs, or 80 million individual full-length reads.

The target amount of data we select is based on microbiome complexity, the proportion of host RNA and the analysis objective. After rRNA, host sequences and low-quality reads have been filtered out, less usable data will remain. The quotation should specify whether the stated amount refers to raw or filtered data.

Common mistakes

COMMON MISTAKES4 mistakes
Inadequate preservation of materialDelaying RNA stabilisation may alter the gene expression profile and reduce sample quality.
Choosing poly(A) selection for the entire microbiomeThis approach to library preparation does not provide a representative profile of bacterial mRNAs. You need an appropriately selected method for rRNA depletion.
Treating a higher transcript count as evidence of higher gene expression per cellThe result also depends on the relative abundance of a particular microorganism in the sample.
Replacing biological replicates with a larger amount of sequencing dataDeeper sequencing does not replace the independent samples needed to compare groups.

Questions for project planning

01What is the study objective and which groups or conditions do you want to compare?
02What material do the samples come from and which microorganisms might they contain? Is host material present?
03How many samples and independent biological replicates does the project include?
04Will you provide RNA or material for extraction? How has it been preserved and what are its quality parameters?
05Do you have metagenomic data from the same samples?
06What scope of bioinformatics analysis do you need?

Describe your project - we will recommend a method and amount of data.

Selected projects and client publications

See which institutions we perform next-generation sequencing (NGS) for and explore scientific publications that draw on the data we have supplied.

Selected publications (1 publication)

INSTITUTION
SCOPE OF WORK
PROJECT YEARS
PUBLICATIONS (JOURNAL, YEAR)
PROJECT YEARS
2025
PUBLICATIONS (JOURNAL, YEAR)
International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2026
Apple Pomace Fermented with Non-Saccharomyces Yeast as a Factor Modulating Gut Microbiota
doi.org/10.3390/ijms27072960 ↗

Selected projects (5 orders)

To protect client confidentiality, we show only selected projects for public-sector institutions that are not covered by non-disclosure agreements (NDAs).
Last updated: 5 November 2026
See more weSEQ.IT projects (151)
KEYWORDS
metatranscriptomicsMetatranscriptomic Seqshotgun metagenomicsMetagenomic sequencingmicrobiomegene expressionfunctional profilingrRNA depletionRINamount of data
Was this article helpful?
Your feedback helps us improve the knowledge base.

Looking for another article?

Back to all topics →

Let's discuss your project.

We will prepare a quotation within 48 hours of receiving your enquiry.